Abstract
The epistemic interview is a conversational practice, which aims to generate knowledge by subjecting respondents' beliefs to dialectical tests of reasons. Developed by Svend Brinkmann, this model draws inspiration from Socratic dialogues where the interviewer asks confronting questions to press respondents to articulate the normative bases of their views. In this article, the author argues that Brinkmann's model is a valuable methodological innovation but warrants further development. The author suggests that the epistemic interview can be put on a stronger methodological footing when the Socratic model is complemented by developments in democratic theory, particularly its deliberative variety. Translating deliberative democratic virtues to methodological terms addresses some of the epistemic model's gaps, including an account of the dynamic of knowledge production and the ethical norms that govern this method. To illustrate the practice of epistemic interviewing, the author draws on her experience in interviewing junior military officers.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 571-582 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | American journal of men's health |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 5 |
| Publication status | Published - Sept 2012 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- deliberative democracy
- epistemic interview
- qualitative interviews
- Socratic dialogue
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Health(social science)
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Respondents as Interlocutors: Translating Deliberative Democratic Principles to Qualitative Interviewing Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver