Abstract
In this paper, the activities involved in searching for buried items with technical aids are explored. The domain of exploration is topical because it can be applied to the search for explosive devices by military and security forces, the ergonomics of which have received relatively little attention. A study is presented which tests the hypothesis that search involves separate cognitive processes for recognising locations and features. It is shown that, while both forms of search tested (i.e., using a trowel or a metal detector) perform similarly when considering location, the recall of features is impaired when using the metal detector. This is interpreted as evidence of different search strategies and information processing in the two conditions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Contemporary Ergonomics 2009 |
| Pages | 255-262 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Dec 2009 |
| Event | Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society on Contemporary Ergonomics 2009 - London, United Kingdom Duration: 1 Apr 2009 → 1 Apr 2009 |
Publication series
| Name | Contemporary Ergonomics 2009 |
|---|
Conference
| Conference | Annual Conference of the Ergonomics Society on Contemporary Ergonomics 2009 |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | United Kingdom |
| City | London |
| Period | 1/04/09 → 1/04/09 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Human Factors and Ergonomics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reporting location and environmental features when using metal detector or probe in a simplified mine detection task'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver