Abstract
There is, on the face of it, a logical difficulty as well as a practical one about ascribing to parents both a right to give their children a religious upbringing and a duty to avoid indoctrinating them. Curiously, this logical difficulty was largely overlooked in the debate on religious upbringing and parental rights between Terence McLaughlin, Eamonn Callan and Peter Gardner in the 1980s. In this paper I set out the terms of the logical problem and propose a solution to it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 545-557 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Philosophy of Education |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2002 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Religious Upbringing Reconsidered'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver