Religion, reason and nondirective teaching : a reply to Trevor Cooling

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Citations (Scopus)
    260 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    In other work I have argued that decisions about what to teach directively and what non-directively should be governed by an epistemic criterion. Trevor Cooling has recently advanced some objections to my defence and application of the epistemic criterion and proposed an alternative to it. Here I reply to his objections and comment on his proposed alternative.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)79-85
    Number of pages7
    JournalJournal of Beliefs and Values
    Volume35
    Issue number1
    Early online date28 May 2014
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 28 May 2014

    Keywords

    • religion
    • reason
    • directive teaching
    • scriptural authority
    • non-directive teaching
    • epistemic criterion
    • behavioural criterion

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Religion, reason and nondirective teaching : a reply to Trevor Cooling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this