Abstract
In other work I have argued that decisions about what to teach directively and what non-directively should be governed by an epistemic criterion. Trevor Cooling has recently advanced some objections to my defence and application of the epistemic criterion and proposed an alternative to it. Here I reply to his objections and comment on his proposed alternative.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 79-85 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Journal of Beliefs and Values |
Volume | 35 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 28 May 2014 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 28 May 2014 |
Keywords
- religion
- reason
- directive teaching
- scriptural authority
- non-directive teaching
- epistemic criterion
- behavioural criterion