Abstract
Interest in the relational dimensions of public administration is growing. However,
the significance of relationality has not been understood, nor has the diversity of
relational approaches been synthesized into a coherent research agenda. Relational
public administration developed from the decline of rational policy models and the
advent of network governance. We draw on relational sociology to formulate
a relational perspective of larger scope, integrating relational process ontology,
practice theory, social network analyses, and interpretive policy analysis. A heuristic
framework classifies relational public administration research in four types:
Connected Actors, Co-Creation Networks, Interactive Performance, and Dynamic
Systems.
the significance of relationality has not been understood, nor has the diversity of
relational approaches been synthesized into a coherent research agenda. Relational
public administration developed from the decline of rational policy models and the
advent of network governance. We draw on relational sociology to formulate
a relational perspective of larger scope, integrating relational process ontology,
practice theory, social network analyses, and interpretive policy analysis. A heuristic
framework classifies relational public administration research in four types:
Connected Actors, Co-Creation Networks, Interactive Performance, and Dynamic
Systems.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Number of pages | 23 |
| Journal | Public Management Review |
| Early online date | 1 Jul 2019 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 1 Jul 2019 |
Keywords
- interaction
- network governance
- relational public administration
- relationistic
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Public Administration