Regulating place distinctiveness: A critique of approaches to the protection of ʼneighborhood character’ in Melbourne

Gethin Davison*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Insideness is a key concept in the analytical repertoire, developed by Edward Relph to understand place and placelessness. This chapter highlights a body of work that evidences the persistence of local attachments in the global era, although its nature may be being transformed. It focuses on the historical and political dimensions of belonging, before concluding that insideness persists as part of the human condition even alongside the growth of cosmopolitan values. Recent research suggests that insideness remains a feature of the human condition in an age of mobilities. Indeed, its importance may well be increasing as individuals are confronted with intensifying and destabilizing material and cultural flows. Place remains an important field for the production of culture and materiality and the construction of discursive boundaries, while forms of territorial attachment remain an important part of the human experience with a wide range of cultural and political implications.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationPlace and Placelessness Revisited
PublisherTaylor and Francis
Pages76-91
Number of pages16
ISBN (Electronic)9781317385226
ISBN (Print)9781138937116
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jul 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Taylor & Francis.

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Engineering
  • General Arts and Humanities
  • General Social Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating place distinctiveness: A critique of approaches to the protection of ʼneighborhood character’ in Melbourne'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this