Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems: exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability

Louise Hatherall*, Nayha Sethi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The proliferation of autonomous and semi-autonomous systems (AS) poses important and pressing regulatory challenges. Underpinning these is the recognition that many different stakeholders will need to trust systems to ensure their effective adoption and implementation. However, research on stakeholder perspectives is lacking, and assessing trustworthiness is difficult due to ‘responsibility gaps’ where it is unclear where responsibility for harms arising from AS ought to lie. Bridging these gaps is important because holding one another responsible is how social trust is maintained, and trust is vital to unlocking the promise that AS hold. This article considers how the concept of answerability could provide a useful framework for boosting the trustworthiness of AS. We present findings from a series of stakeholder interviews identifying what answers different stakeholders need to trust AS in health, finance, and government applications, and consider the implications of our research for current proposals for regulating AS in the United Kingdom and the European Union.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)586-609
JournalJournal of Law and Society
Volume51
Issue number4
Early online date10 Oct 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2024

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Regulating for trustworthy autonomous systems: exploring stakeholder perspectives on answerability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this