Abstract
At the turn of this century Durand, and Lagarias and Pleasants established that key features of minimal subshifts (and their higher-dimensional analogues) to be studied are linearly repetitive, repulsive and power free. Since then, generalisations and extensions of these features, namely α-repetitive, α-repulsive and α-finite (α≥1), have been introduced and studied. We establish the equivalence of α-repulsive and α-finite for general subshifts over finite alphabets. Further, we studied a family of aperiodic minimal subshifts stemming from Grigorchuk’s infinite 2-group G. In particular, we show that these subshifts provide examples that demonstrate α-repulsive (and hence α-finite) is not equivalent to α-repetitive, for α>1. We also give necessary and sufficient conditions for these subshifts to be α-repetitive, and α-repulsive (and hence α-finite). Moreover, we obtain an explicit formula for their complexity functions from which we deduce that they are uniquely ergodic.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 413–434 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Bulletin of Mathematical Sciences |
| Volume | 8 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 29 Mar 2017 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2018 |
Keywords
- Aperiodic order
- Complexity
- Subshifts
- Grigorchuk group
- Unique ergodicity
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Regularity of aperiodic minimal subshifts'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver