Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Referral rates of patients with diabetes to secondary care are inversely related to the prevalence of diabetes in each primary care practice and confidence in treatment, not to HbA1c level

  • Q. Z. Siah
  • , N. H. Ubeysekara
  • , P. N. Taylor
  • , S. J. Davies
  • , F. S. Wong
  • , C. M. Dayan
  • , M. Alhadj Ali*
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Aims: To determine the factors affecting the referral rates of patients with diabetes from primary care to secondary care.

Methods: A study based on 66 GP surgeries in the Cardiff and Vale University Health Board (population: 515,581) was conducted. We included patients who had an established clinical diagnosis of diabetes (type 1 and type 2) from September 2017 to September 2018. HbA1c outcome data of GP surgeries were obtained from the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF) database published for 2018. Referral rates were obtained from the electronic referral database of Cardiff and Vale University Health Board over the same period, and this was adjusted according to the number of patients with diabetes in each GP surgery. Confidence level on the treatment of diabetes among GPs was assessed as a sub-study conducted in nine GP surgeries in the same area, using a self-administered questionnaire. Linear regression was undertaken to assess the relationship between adjusted referral rate and key factors which might influence prescribing rate.

Results: The average adjusted referral rate to secondary care in one year was 4.23% of patients with diabetes in each GP surgery, with a wide variation of 1.24% to 16.28%. The average percentage of patients with diabetes with HbA1c < 59 mmol/mol was 63.17% (range: 43.19–76.23%). The average confidence score of GPs in treating diabetes was 67% and ranged from 50–85% in the sub-study. Referral rates correlated inversely with the numbers of patients with diabetes in each practice β = −0.32; (95% CI −0.57, −0.08) p = 0.01, but there was no significant correlation with the HbA1c outcome β = −0.13; (95% CI −0.39, 0.12); p = 0.30. Borderline significant negative correlation was observed between referral rates and overall practice size β = −0.23; (95% CI −0.48, 0.02) p = 0.07.

Conclusions: Referral rates of patients with diabetes to secondary care are determined by the number of patients with diabetes in each practice and confidence level in treatment, not by the overall practice size or HbA1c level. Ensuring quality training in diabetes care for primary care teams as well as the development of integrated diabetes care may be the best way to optimise the volume and appropriateness of referrals to secondary care.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)513-517
Number of pages5
JournalPrimary Care Diabetes
Volume15
Issue number3
Early online date20 Feb 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Diabetes care
  • Primary care
  • Secondary care

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Internal Medicine
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Nutrition and Dietetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Referral rates of patients with diabetes to secondary care are inversely related to the prevalence of diabetes in each primary care practice and confidence in treatment, not to HbA1c level'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this