Reconsidering the 'Ten Myths' about Character Education

Kristjan Kristjansson*, Tom Harrison, Andrew Peterson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

149 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Is character education flawed as an approach to values education? A 2013 article answered that question in the negative and defused ten common objections against character education as ‘myths’. The aim of the present article is to revisit those objections and consider the evidence that has accumulated since 2013. After a brief historical and conceptual rehearsal, the core section of the article is taken up with reminders of the original arguments rebutting each myth, complemented with additional updated, and more extensive, considerations that were not available at the time. The original article contained a section on ‘three well-founded misgivings’. We argue that none of those misgivings is as relevant in today’s climate as they were in 2013. However, we acknowledge that those misgivings have been superseded by new challenges that test the theoretical flexibility and empirical credibility of character education. To ensure that those interested in human flourishing can continue to dispel myths about character education and address the most pressing challenges in the field, we close with some reflections on the future of character education and where we see its next ideal academic destinations to be.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages24
JournalBritish Journal of Educational Studies
Early online date23 Jul 2024
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 23 Jul 2024

Keywords

  • character education
  • myths and misgivings
  • neo-Aristotelianism
  • virtue ethics
  • future developments

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering the 'Ten Myths' about Character Education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this