Recent work on the nature and development of delusions

Lisa Bortolotti, Kengo Miyazono

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
362 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In this paper we review two debates in the current literature on clinical delusions. One debate is about what delusions are. If delusions are beliefs, why are they described as failing to play the causal roles that characterise beliefs, such as being responsive to evidence and guiding action? The other debate is about how delusions develop. What processes lead people to form delusions and maintain them in the face of challenges and counter-evidence? Do the formation and maintenance of delusions require abnormal experience alone, or also reasoning biases or deficits? We hope to show that the focus on delusions has made a substantial contribution to the philosophy of the mind and continues to raise issues that are central to defining the concept of belief and gaining a better understanding of how people process information and learn about the world.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)636-645
JournalPhilosophy Compass
Volume10
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 4 Sep 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent work on the nature and development of delusions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this