Abstract
Recently, great attention has been paid to the identification and prediction of the androgen disrupting potencies of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs). However, few existing models can discriminate active and inactive compounds, which make the quantitative prediction process including the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) technique unreliable. In this study, different grouping methods were investigated and compared for qualitative identification, including molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulations (MD). The results showed that qualitative identification based on MD, which is lab-independent, accurate and closer to the real transcriptional activation process, could separate 90.5% of active and inactive chemicals and was preferred. The 3D-QSAR models built as the quantitative simulation method showed r2 and q2 values of 0.513 and 0.980, respectively. Together, a novel workflow combining qualitative identification and quantitative simulations was generated with processes including activeness discrimination and activity prediction. This workflow, for analyzing the antagonism of androgen receptor (AR) of PBDEs is not only allowing researchers to reduce their intense laboratory experiments but also assisting them in inspecting and adjusting their laboratory systems and results.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 495-501 |
Number of pages | 7 |
Journal | Science of the Total Environment |
Volume | 603-604 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Dec 2017 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported by Natural Science Foundation of China (21577058), Nonprofit Industry Research Subject (201409040), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (BK20130551), and the Collaborative Innovation Center for Regional Environmental Quality. The computational calculations were performed on the IBM Blade cluster system in the High Performance Computing Center (HPCC) of Nanjing University.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017
Keywords
- Androgen
- Classification models
- CoMSIA
- MD simulations
- PBDEs
- QSAR
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Environmental Engineering
- Environmental Chemistry
- Waste Management and Disposal
- Pollution