Public preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests: a review of conjoint analysis studies

Alex Ghanouni, Samuel G Smith, Steve Halligan, Andrew Plumb, Darren Boone, Guiqing Lily Yao, Shihua Zhu, Richard Lilford, Jane Wardle, Christian von Wagner

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A wide range of screening technologies is available for colorectal cancer screening. There is demand to discover public preferences for these tests on the rationale that tailoring screening to preferences may improve uptake. This review describes a type of study (conjoint analysis) used to assess people's preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests and critically evaluates research quality using a recently published set of guidelines. Most primary studies assessed preferences for colonoscopy and fecal occult blood testing but newer technologies (e.g., capsule endoscopy) have not yet been evaluated. Although studies often adhered to guidelines, there was limited correspondence between stated preferences and actual screening behavior. Future research should investigate how studies can go beyond the guidelines in order to improve this and also explore how test preferences may differ by important population subgroups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)489-99
Number of pages11
JournalExpert review of medical devices
Volume10
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public preferences for colorectal cancer screening tests: a review of conjoint analysis studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this