Abstract
The overarching aim of this contribution is to show how there are many elements in the making of a psychiatric diagnosis that are not confined to the nature of the “disease”—a topic that would require another work in order to be properly clarified—but rather that are grounded in the historical context and social elements. The circular and mutual influences of these elements contribute to forge certain epistemological frameworks that legitimize the use of certain diagnostic categories. This essay is divided into three sections. In the first section, we highlight how the notion of psychiatric diagnosis needs to be considered in light of some specific epistemological assumptions that deal both with theoretical principles, never mentioned in the most used diagnostic manuals, and with power relations. In the second section, we analyze the role of collective emotions in the making of a diagnosis and particularly their political implications. In the third section, we provide a historical and epistemological analysis of the birth of Asperger’s syndrome, highlighting the role of collective emotions and their ideological impact on this diagnosis.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 70-82 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Humanistic Psychologist |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 10 Nov 2022 |
Event | Philosophy of Psychiatry Special Interest Group Biennial Conference 2019 - London, United Kingdom Duration: 3 Sept 2019 → 3 Sept 2019 |
Bibliographical note
This contribution is a revised and extended version of the talk we wrote and delivered on September 3, 2019, at The Royal College of Psychiatrists in London for the Biennial Conference of the Special Interest Group in Philosophy.Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 American Psychological Association
Keywords
- Asperger syndrome
- collective emotions
- diagnosis
- epistemology
- history of psychiatry
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Social Psychology
- Applied Psychology