Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour

  • Rachael E. Lofthouse*
  • , William R. Lindsay
  • , Vasiliki Totsika
  • , Richard P. Hastings
  • , Douglas P. Boer
  • , James L. Haaven
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present study was to add to the literature on the predictive accuracy of a dynamic intellectual disability specific risk assessment tool. Method: A dynamic risk assessment for sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S), a static risk assessment for sexual offending (STATIC-99), and a static risk assessment for violence (Violence Risk Appraisal Guide [VRAG]) were completed for a sample of 64 adult males with an intellectual disability. Results: The dynamic risk assessment for sexual offenders with an intellectual disability resulted in the best prediction of sexual reoffending (ARMIDILO-S area under the curve (AUC) = 0.92) this was better than an established sexual offending static risk assessment (STATIC-99 AUC = 0.75). A static tool for violent reoffending, did not perform as well in this group (VRAG AUC = 0.58). Conclusions: Results suggest that dynamic variables are useful in predicting sexual reoffending with individuals with an intellectual disability, confirming previous findings. The ARMIDILO-S is a promising dynamic risk assessment for individuals with an intellectual disability.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)394-403
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume26
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2013

Keywords

  • Developmental delay
  • Dynamic risk assessment
  • Intellectual disability
  • Reoffending
  • Risk assessment
  • Sexual offending

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective dynamic assessment of risk of sexual reoffending in individuals with an intellectual disability and a history of sexual offending behaviour'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this