Property rights, deregulation and entrepreneurial development in a transition economy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
218 Downloads (Pure)


This article investigates the relative roles of formal property rights institutions versus deregulated markets in entrepreneurial development, based on China's market transition. Empirically, it is not yet known which set of institutions matters more for entrepreneurship, particularly in the long run, despite the existence of well-established theoretical arguments for each. Using provincial-level panel data from China's transition economy, this study has the following findings: On average, both formal protection of property rights and deregulated markets have positive effects on entrepreneurial development; yet, as market transition progresses, the effect of formal protection of property rights increases, while that of deregulated markets decreases. These results are robust to both multiple model specifications and an endogeneity test using an instrumental variable approach. Overall, therefore, while both sets of institutions indeed play positive roles in entrepreneurial development, property rights institutions may be more fundamental in the long run.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)73-103
Number of pages31
JournalManagement and Organization Review
Issue number1
Early online date8 Nov 2017
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2018


  • China
  • deregulated markets
  • entrepreneurial development
  • property rights
  • regionally decentralized system
  • transition economy


Dive into the research topics of 'Property rights, deregulation and entrepreneurial development in a transition economy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this