TY - JOUR
T1 - Prison and community populations at ultra-high risk of psychosis
T2 - Differences and challenges for service provision
AU - Jarrett, Manuela
AU - Jamieson-Craig, Tom K.
AU - Forrester, Andrew
AU - McGuire, Philip
AU - Badger, Steven
AU - Fusar-Poli, Paolo
AU - Byrne, Majella
AU - Williams, Paul
AU - Valmaggia, Lucia R.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of the studywas to explore the feasibility of expanding a community service for early detection of psychosis into a local London prison for men in the United Kingdom. Methods: All new receptions to a local prison for men in South London were approached for routine screening. Those who met criteria for being at ultra-high-risk of psychosis were compared with a help-seeking sample from the community who met the same criteria. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were compared to determine whether the prison and community populations had similar profiles and mental health needs. Results: Of 891 prisoners screened, 44 (5%) met criteria for being at ultra-high risk of psychosis. The community sample consisted of 42 participants. Compared with the community group, prison participants had lower scores on almost all symptom measures, were less likely to have remained in school and completed exams, and were more likely to be in short-term accommodations and to be of black raceethnicity. Lifetime use of illicit drugs was similar between the groups, but recent use was much higher in the prison group. Conclusions: Expanding community services into custodial settings should take into account the different environment and needs of the prisoner population. Specifically, early detection and intervention services should target a broad range of mental health problems rather than psychosis alone.
AB - Objective: The aim of the studywas to explore the feasibility of expanding a community service for early detection of psychosis into a local London prison for men in the United Kingdom. Methods: All new receptions to a local prison for men in South London were approached for routine screening. Those who met criteria for being at ultra-high-risk of psychosis were compared with a help-seeking sample from the community who met the same criteria. Clinical and sociodemographic characteristics were compared to determine whether the prison and community populations had similar profiles and mental health needs. Results: Of 891 prisoners screened, 44 (5%) met criteria for being at ultra-high risk of psychosis. The community sample consisted of 42 participants. Compared with the community group, prison participants had lower scores on almost all symptom measures, were less likely to have remained in school and completed exams, and were more likely to be in short-term accommodations and to be of black raceethnicity. Lifetime use of illicit drugs was similar between the groups, but recent use was much higher in the prison group. Conclusions: Expanding community services into custodial settings should take into account the different environment and needs of the prisoner population. Specifically, early detection and intervention services should target a broad range of mental health problems rather than psychosis alone.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84990039909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500355
DO - 10.1176/appi.ps.201500355
M3 - Article
C2 - 27032664
AN - SCOPUS:84990039909
SN - 1075-2730
VL - 67
SP - 990
EP - 995
JO - Psychiatric services
JF - Psychiatric services
IS - 9
ER -