Abstract
Cognitive linguists have argued that metaphors are anchored in our embodied experiences. Cultural, linguistic and gestural representations are often seen as reflections of underlying conceptual mappings. On the basis of three different metaphors, more is up, similarity is proximity, and social distance is spatial distance (a.k.a. intimacy is closeness), we argue for a more active role of external representations in individual cognition. Rather than being mere “reflections” of the respective conceptual associations, external representations actively enhance and support these. Since two of the metaphors we discuss associate the same source domain (spatial distance) with different target domains (similarity and social closeness), we also discuss in how far primary metaphors are (by necessity) interrelated, and whether these metaphors can be treated as distinct conceptual entities at all.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Metaphor |
Subtitle of host publication | Embodied Cognition and Discourse |
Editors | Beate Hampe |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
Chapter | 6 |
Pages | 99-116 |
Number of pages | 33 |
ISBN (Electronic) | 9781108182324 |
ISBN (Print) | 9781107198333 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jul 2017 |
Keywords
- metaphor
- embodied cognition
- culture
- primary metaphors
- space and time
- social cognition
- media