Projects per year
In response to slow progress regarding technological innovations to manage type 1 diabetes, some patients have created unregulated do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIY APS). Yet both in the United Kingdom (UK) and internationally, there is an almost complete lack of specific guidance – legal, regulatory, or ethical – for clinicians caring for DIY APS users. Uncertainty regarding their professional obligations has led to them being cautious about discussing DIY APS with patients, let alone recommending or prescribing them. In this article, we argue that this approach threatens to undermine trust and transparency. Analysing the professional guidance from the UK regulator – the General Medical Council – we demonstrate that nothing within it ought to be interpreted as precluding clinicians from initiating discussions about DIY APS. Moreover, in some circumstances, it may require that clinicians do so. We also argue that the guidance does not preclude clinicians from prescribing such unapproved medical devices.
|Number of pages||27|
|Journal||Medical law international|
|Publication status||Published - 12 Apr 2021|
Bibliographical noteFunding Information:
The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award in Humanities and Social Sciences 2019–2024 (Grant No. 212507/Z/18/Z), an ESRC Impact Acceleration Award, and a Quality-related Research grant from Research England.
© The Author(s) 2021.
- Do-it-yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems
- Doctor–patient Relationship
- General Medical Council
- Informed consent
- Professional Regulation
- Unapproved Medical Devices
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Prescribing unapproved medical devices? The case of DIY artificial pancreas systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Active
Everyday Cyborgs 2.0: Law's Boundary-Work & Alternative Legal Futures
1/09/19 → 1/09/25