Predicting aggression in adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study of the predictive efficacy of the Current Risk of Violence and the Short Dynamic Risk Scale

Rachael E. Lofthouse*, Laura Golding, Vasiliki Totsika, Richard P. Hastings, William R. Lindsay

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Structured assessments have been shown to assist professionals to evaluate the risk of aggression in secure services for general offender populations and more recently among adults with intellectual disabilities. There is a need to develop intellectual disability sensitive measures for predicting risk of aggression in community samples, especially tools with a focus on dynamic variables. Methods: The study prospectively followed 28 participants for up to 2 months to test whether the Current Risk of Violence (CuRV) and Short Dynamic Risk Scale (SDRS) were able to predict verbal and physical aggression in a community sample of adults with intellectual disability. Results: CuRV and SDRS ratings significantly predicted verbal and physical aggression over a 2-month period. Conclusions: The current study supports the use of the CuRV with adults with intellectual disability living in community settings. The CuRV and SDRS are worthy of future development and evaluation in independent investigations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)702-710
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities
Volume33
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 John Wiley & Sons Ltd

Keywords

  • community learning disability services
  • dynamic risk factors
  • intellectual disability
  • risk assessment and management

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Predicting aggression in adults with intellectual disability: A pilot study of the predictive efficacy of the Current Risk of Violence and the Short Dynamic Risk Scale'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this