PRA in the nuclear sector. Quantifying human error and human malice

Anthony G. Heyes

doi:10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X

PRA in the nuclear sector. Quantifying human error and human malice

Anthony G. Heyes^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Economics

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Regardless of the regulatory style chosen ('command and control' or 'functional') a vital prerequisite for coherent safety regulation in the nuclear power industry is the ability to assess accident risk. In this paper we present a critical analysis of current techniques of probabilistic risk analysis applied in the industry, with particular regard to the problems of quantifying risks arising from, or exacerbated by, human risk and/or human error.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1027-1034
Number of pages	8
Journal	Energy Policy
Volume	23
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X
Publication status	Published - Dec 1995

Keywords

Nuclear power
Regulation
Safety assessment

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Energy
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

Access to Document

10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X

Cite this

@article{a5a40a08c4cd4e61885550068cf2f096,

title = "PRA in the nuclear sector. Quantifying human error and human malice",

abstract = "Regardless of the regulatory style chosen ('command and control' or 'functional') a vital prerequisite for coherent safety regulation in the nuclear power industry is the ability to assess accident risk. In this paper we present a critical analysis of current techniques of probabilistic risk analysis applied in the industry, with particular regard to the problems of quantifying risks arising from, or exacerbated by, human risk and/or human error.",

keywords = "Nuclear power, Regulation, Safety assessment",

author = "Heyes, \{Anthony G.\}",

year = "1995",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X",

language = "English",

volume = "23",

pages = "1027--1034",

journal = "Energy Policy",

issn = "0301-4215",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - PRA in the nuclear sector. Quantifying human error and human malice

AU - Heyes, Anthony G.

PY - 1995/12

Y1 - 1995/12

N2 - Regardless of the regulatory style chosen ('command and control' or 'functional') a vital prerequisite for coherent safety regulation in the nuclear power industry is the ability to assess accident risk. In this paper we present a critical analysis of current techniques of probabilistic risk analysis applied in the industry, with particular regard to the problems of quantifying risks arising from, or exacerbated by, human risk and/or human error.

AB - Regardless of the regulatory style chosen ('command and control' or 'functional') a vital prerequisite for coherent safety regulation in the nuclear power industry is the ability to assess accident risk. In this paper we present a critical analysis of current techniques of probabilistic risk analysis applied in the industry, with particular regard to the problems of quantifying risks arising from, or exacerbated by, human risk and/or human error.

KW - Nuclear power

KW - Regulation

KW - Safety assessment

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0029415464

U2 - 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X

DO - 10.1016/0301-4215(95)00081-X

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:0029415464

SN - 0301-4215

VL - 23

SP - 1027

EP - 1034

JO - Energy Policy

JF - Energy Policy

IS - 12

ER -

PRA in the nuclear sector. Quantifying human error and human malice

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this