Abstract
This article analyses the development and legacy of public order legislation with respect to collective action in the UK. We identify two recurring and interconnected themes. First, successive public order Acts have reacted to waves of protest by expanding the scope of what is deemed a threat, shifting the focus from violence to disruption. The most recent Acts redefine disruptive protest as a form of social harm. Second, this extension of state power has been accompanied by a steady constriction of the courtroom as a space for resistance. While the use of law as a repressive tool inevitably produces a dialectical effect, as those targeted develop new networks, means, and spaces of resistance, the formal legal avenues for activists to justify their actions are now highly circumscribed. The courtroom, therefore, remains a critical but increasingly challenging arena where the democratic case for protest is continually asserted.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Public Law |
| Publication status | Accepted/In press - 4 Dec 2025 |
Bibliographical note
Not yet published as of 02/03/2026.This article is going to be published in Protest Law at Forty: Reflections on Part II of the Public Order Act 1986 (a Special issue of Public Law).
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Political Activism in the Courts from the Public Order Act 1986 to the Public Order Act 2023: Repression and Resistance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver