Plurals and Mereology

Salvatore Florio, David Nicolas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
292 Downloads (Pure)


In linguistics, the dominant approach to the semantics of plurals appeals to mereology. However, this approach has received strong criticisms from philosophical logicians who subscribe to an alternative framework based on plural logic. In the first part of the article, we offer a precise characterization of the mereological approach and the semantic background in which the debate can be meaningfully reconstructed. In the second part, we deal with the criticisms and assess their logical, linguistic, and philosophical significance. We identify four main objections and show how each can be addressed. Finally, we compare the strengths and shortcomings of the mereological approach and plural logic. Our conclusion is that the former remains a viable and well-motivated framework for the analysis of plurals.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Philosophical Logic
Early online date26 Oct 2020
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 26 Oct 2020


  • Mass nouns
  • Mereology
  • Model theory
  • Natural language semantics
  • Ontological commitment
  • Plural logic
  • Plurals
  • Russell’s paradox
  • Truth theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Philosophy


Dive into the research topics of 'Plurals and Mereology'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this