Planning out abjection? The role of the planning profession in post-apartheid South Africa

Phil Jones, Lauren Andres, Stuart Paul Denoon-Stevens, Lorena Melgaco Silva Marques

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

170 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For Kristeva (1982) the abject not only caused visceral disgust but posed a threat to the established order of society. The abject is a product of particular times and places but limited attention has been given to understanding the process of transitioning away from abject status. We address this gap here through an examination of the planning profession in post-apartheid South Africa. The paper examines how the abject is fluid and resilient, evolving to fit a changing planning system and broader political economy where a discourse of abjection by race has been replaced by a focus on poverty.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)35-55
Number of pages21
JournalPlanning Theory
Volume21
Issue number1
Early online date29 Apr 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.

Keywords

  • Kristeva
  • South Africa
  • abjection
  • apartheid
  • planning profession

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Geography, Planning and Development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Planning out abjection? The role of the planning profession in post-apartheid South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this