Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers

Mahmoud Elsherif, Linda Wheeldon, Steven Frisson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to the lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007), differences in the orthographic, semantic, and phonological representations of words will affect individual reading performance. Whilst several studies have focused on orthographic precision and semantic coherence, few have considered phonological precision. The present study used a suite of individual difference measures to assess which components of lexical quality contributed to competition resolution in a masked priming experiment. The experiment measured form priming for word and pseudoword targets with dense and sparse neighbourhoods in 84 university students. Individual difference measures of language and cognitive skills were also collected and a principal component analysis was used to group these data into components. The data showed that phonological precision and NHD interacted with form priming. In participants with high phonological precision, the direction of priming for word targets with sparse neighbourhoods was facilitatory, while the direction for those with dense neighbourhoods was inhibitory. In contrast, people with low phonological precision showed the opposite pattern, but the interaction was non-significant. These results suggest that the component of phonological precision is linked to lexical competition for word recognition and that access to the mental lexicon during reading is affected by differing levels of phonological processing.
Original languageEnglish
JournalQuarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Early online date1 Sep 2021
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 1 Sep 2021

Keywords

  • Lexical quality hypothesis
  • visual word recognition
  • orthography
  • phonology
  • semantics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phonological precision for word recognition in skilled readers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this