Abstract
Self-restraint is often reported in individuals with mental retardation who show self-injurious behavior (SIB). In this study, the phenomenology and prevalence of self-restraint in individuals showing self-injury and wearing protective devices and those showing self-injury but not wearing protective devices were compared. A high prevalence of self-restraint in the whole sample of individuals showing self-injury was identified (67/88, 76.1%), and self-restraint was more prevalent in a group showing self-injury but not wearing protective devices (43/47, 91.5%) than in a group showing self-injury and wearing protective devices (24/41, 58.5%). Individuals not wearing protective devices showed a greater number of topographies of self-restraint than those who did wear them. Results are discussed with reference to the purely topographical definition of self-restraint employed and the potential equivalence of protective devices and self-restraint.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 71-81 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | American Journal on Mental Retardation |
| Volume | 108 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2003 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Phenomenology of self-restraint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver