Phenomenology of self-restraint

Christopher Oliver, G Murphy, S Hall, Kate Arron, J Leggett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)
371 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Self-restraint is often reported in individuals with mental retardation who show self-injurious behavior (SIB). In this study, the phenomenology and prevalence of self-restraint in individuals showing self-injury and wearing protective devices and those showing self-injury but not wearing protective devices were compared. A high prevalence of self-restraint in the whole sample of individuals showing self-injury was identified (67/88, 76.1%), and self-restraint was more prevalent in a group showing self-injury but not wearing protective devices (43/47, 91.5%) than in a group showing self-injury and wearing protective devices (24/41, 58.5%). Individuals not wearing protective devices showed a greater number of topographies of self-restraint than those who did wear them. Results are discussed with reference to the purely topographical definition of self-restraint employed and the potential equivalence of protective devices and self-restraint.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-81
Number of pages11
JournalAmerican Journal on Mental Retardation
Volume108
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2003

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Phenomenology of self-restraint'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this