Abstract
"Clinical equipoise" is defined as the genuine uncertainty by the expert medical community of the most beneficial treatment. A survey performed in 2013 by a patient support group, Ovacome, of gynaecological oncologists in the UK on ultra-radical surgery in advanced ovarian cancer has shown that there is a wide variation in surgical practice across the country. In addition, there were mixed views on the quality of published evidence justifying it's performance, signifying a state of clinical equipoise. The survey also identified widespread insufficient infra-structural resources and lack of surgical training and skills. The majority of respondents would be prepared to undertake additional training to acquire the surgical skills and/or refer to other centres/surgeons already performing the surgery and/or recruit to surgical trials investigating ultra-radical surgery in advanced ovarian cancer.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 91-94 |
| Journal | International Journal of Gynecological Cancer |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Early online date | 28 Oct 2015 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Jan 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- patient support groups
- gynaecological oncology
- ultraradical surgery
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Medicine
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Patient support groups identifying clinical equipoise in UK gynaecological oncology surgeons as the basis for trials in ultraradical surgery for advanced ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver