Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patient-reported outcome measures for facial skin cancer: a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of their measurement properties

  • T. D. Dobbs*
  • , H. Samarendra
  • , S. Hughes
  • , H. A. Hutchings
  • , I. Whitaker
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Skin cancer is the commonest malignancy worldwide, often occurring on the face. Both the condition and treatment can lead to scarring and facial disfigurement, affecting a patient's health-related quality of life (HRQoL), which can be measured using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Objectives: This systematic review identifies PROMs for facial skin cancer and appraises their methodological quality and psychometric properties using up-to-date methods. Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane and CINAHL were searched systematically in accordance with PRISMA guidelines, identifying all PROMs designed for or validated in facial skin cancer. Methodological quality and evidence of psychometric properties were assessed using the COnsensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist and criteria proposed by Terwee and colleagues. A best-evidence synthesis and assessment of instrument focus on post-resection reconstruction was also performed. Results: We included 24 studies on 11 PROMs. Methodological quality and psychometric evidence was variable, with the Patient Outcome of Surgery – Head/Neck (POS-H/N), Skin Cancer Index (SCI), Skin Cancer Quality of Life Impact Tool (SCQOLIT) and Essers and colleagues demonstrating the greatest level of validation. None scored well in their relevance to post-skin cancer reconstruction of the face. Conclusions: This systematic review critically appraises PROMs for facial skin cancer using internationally accepted criteria. The identified PROMs demonstrate a variation in the quality of validation performed, with a need to improve this across all PROMs in the field. Only through improving the quality of available PROMs and their focus on the post-treatment aesthetic and functional outcome will we be able to truly appreciate the concerns of our patients and improve the management of facial skin cancer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1018-1029
Number of pages12
JournalBritish Journal of Dermatology
Volume180
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 British Association of Dermatologists

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patient-reported outcome measures for facial skin cancer: a systematic review and evaluation of the quality of their measurement properties'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this