Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial

  • Matthew T Seymour
  • , Sarah R Brown
  • , Gary Middleton
  • , Timothy Maughan
  • , Susan Richman
  • , Stephen Gwyther
  • , Catherine Lowe
  • , Jennifer F Seligmann
  • , Jonathan Wadsley
  • , Nick Maisey
  • , Ian Chau
  • , Mark Hill
  • , Lesley Dawson
  • , Stephen Falk
  • , Ann O'Callaghan
  • , Kim Benstead
  • , Philip Chambers
  • , Alfred Oliver
  • , Helen Marshall
  • , Vicky Napp
  • Phil Quirke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

270 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Therapeutic antibodies targeting EGFR have activity in advanced colorectal cancer, but results from clinical trials are inconsistent and the population in which most benefit is derived is uncertain. Our aim was to assess the addition of panitumumab to irinotecan in pretreated advanced colorectal cancer.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)749-59
Number of pages11
JournalThe Lancet Oncology
Volume14
Issue number8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2013

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Panitumumab and irinotecan versus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type, fluorouracil-resistant advanced colorectal cancer (PICCOLO): a prospectively stratified randomised trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this