TY - JOUR
T1 - Palaeobotanical experiences of plant diversity in deep time. II: How to measure and analyse past plant biodiversity
AU - Pardoe, Heather
AU - Cleal, Christopher
AU - Berry, Christopher M.
AU - Cascales-Miñana, Borja
AU - Davis, Basil
AU - Diez, Jose
AU - Martina, Filipova-Marinova
AU - Giesecke, Thomas
AU - Hilton, Jason
AU - Ivanov, Dimiter
AU - Kustacher, Evelyn
AU - Susanne, Leroy
AU - MacElwain, Jennifer
AU - Opluštil, Stanislav
AU - Popa, Mihai
AU - Seyfullah, Leyla
AU - Stolle, Ellen
AU - Thomas, Barry
AU - Uhl, Dieter
PY - 2021/10/15
Y1 - 2021/10/15
N2 - Determining the diversity of past floras helps with interpreting both the history and predicting the future of vegetation change. For global-scale and regional-scale diversity studies especially, secondary data are often used but local-scale studies tend to be based on survey data that require rigorous sampling. The correct sampling strategies depend on the types of fossils being investigated, including their physical size, and whether the aim is to determine taxonomic richness or relative abundance. Describing and comparing diversities can use a range of different metrics, depending on whether binary presence / absence or abundance data are available. Each metric provides a different insight into the diversities and the choice of which to use depends on the research question being investigated. Various numerical approaches are available for identifying spatial and stratigraphical diversity patterns, mainly classificatory techniques (e.g., cluster and parsimony analyses) and ordination (e.g., Detrended Correspondence Analysis, Nonmetric Dimensional Scaling). The choice of technique again depends on the research question, but often it has proved useful to run both types of analysis in tandem. This article is illustrated by past biodiversity case studies from throughout the fossil record, dealing with floras ranging in age from the Devonian to the last few centuries.
AB - Determining the diversity of past floras helps with interpreting both the history and predicting the future of vegetation change. For global-scale and regional-scale diversity studies especially, secondary data are often used but local-scale studies tend to be based on survey data that require rigorous sampling. The correct sampling strategies depend on the types of fossils being investigated, including their physical size, and whether the aim is to determine taxonomic richness or relative abundance. Describing and comparing diversities can use a range of different metrics, depending on whether binary presence / absence or abundance data are available. Each metric provides a different insight into the diversities and the choice of which to use depends on the research question being investigated. Various numerical approaches are available for identifying spatial and stratigraphical diversity patterns, mainly classificatory techniques (e.g., cluster and parsimony analyses) and ordination (e.g., Detrended Correspondence Analysis, Nonmetric Dimensional Scaling). The choice of technique again depends on the research question, but often it has proved useful to run both types of analysis in tandem. This article is illustrated by past biodiversity case studies from throughout the fossil record, dealing with floras ranging in age from the Devonian to the last few centuries.
KW - Classificatory analysis
KW - Ordination
KW - Palaeobotany
KW - Palynology
KW - Taphonomy
KW - Taxonomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116090631&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110618
DO - 10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110618
M3 - Article
SN - 0031-0182
VL - 580
SP - 1
EP - 26
JO - Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
JF - Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology
M1 - 110618
ER -