Abstract
Global peatlands store more carbon than is naturally present in the atmosphere1,2. However, many peatlands are under pressure from drainage-based agriculture, plantation development and fire, with the equivalent of around 3 per cent of all anthropogenic greenhouse gases emitted from drained peatland3–5. Efforts to curb such emissions are intensifying through the conservation of undrained peatlands and re-wetting of drained systems6. Here we report eddy covariance data for carbon dioxide from 16 locations and static chamber measurements for methane from 41 locations in the UK and Ireland. We combine these with published data from sites across all major peatland biomes. We find that the mean annual effective water table depth (WTDe; that is, the average depth of the aerated peat layer) overrides all other ecosystem- and management-related controls on greenhouse gas fluxes. We estimate that every 10 centimetres of reduction in WTDe could reduce the net warming impact of CO2 and CH4 emissions (100-year global warming potentials) by the equivalent of at least 3 tonnes of CO2 per hectare per year, until WTDe is less than 30 centimetres. Raising water levels further would continue to have a net cooling effect until WTDe is within 10 centimetres of the surface. Our results suggest that greenhouse gas emissions from peatlands drained for agriculture could be greatly reduced without necessarily halting their productive use. Halving WTDe in all drained agricultural peatlands, for example, could reduce emissions by the equivalent of over 1 per cent of global anthropogenic emissions.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 548-552 |
Number of pages | 5 |
Journal | Nature |
Volume | 593 |
Issue number | 7860 |
Early online date | 21 Apr 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 27 May 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Acknowledgements This study was supported by the UK Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (projects SP1210 and SP1218), with additional data provided from projects funded by the UK Natural Environment Research Council (SEFLOS, NE/P0140971/1 and UKSCAPE, NE/R016429/1), Scottish Government and Natural Resources Wales (NRW). UK flux sites were hosted by a range of organizations including G’s Fresh, the National Trust, NRW and the Balmoral Estate. We thank all those responsible for collecting the published data used in the study, in particular M. Strack, D. Holl, H. Keck and C. Deshmukh for providing additional data and information on individual studies, L. Menichetti for sharing peat mapping data and L. Barber at the University of Leicester for preparing the site maps.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General