Opposing effects of reward and punishment on human vigor

Benjamin Griffiths, Ulrik R. Beierholm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Citations (Scopus)
164 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The vigor with which humans and animals engage in a task is often a determinant of the likelihood of the task’s success. An influential theoretical model suggests that the speed and rate at which responses are made should depend on the availability of rewards and punishments. While vigor facilitates the gathering of rewards in a bountiful environment, there is an incentive to slow down when punishments are forthcoming so as to decrease the rate of punishments, in conflict with the urge to perform fast to escape punishment. Previous experiments confirmed the former, leaving the latter unanswered. We tested the influence of punishment in an experiment involving economic incentives and contrasted this with reward related behavior on the same task. We found that behavior corresponded with the theoretical model; while instantaneous threat of punishment caused subjects to increase the vigor of their response, subjects’ response times would slow as the overall rate of punishment increased. We quantitatively show that this is in direct contrast to increases in vigor in the face of increased overall reward rates. These results highlight the opposed effects of rewards and punishments and provide further evidence for their roles in the variety of types of human decisions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number42287
JournalScientific Reports
Volume7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Feb 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opposing effects of reward and punishment on human vigor'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this