TY - JOUR
T1 - Open data and digital morphology
AU - Davies, Thomas G. Davies
AU - Lautenschlager, Stephan
AU - Rahman, Imran
AU - Cunningham, John
AU - Asher, Robert
AU - Barrett, Paul
AU - Bates, Karl
AU - Bengtson, Stefan
AU - Benson, Roger
AU - Boyer, Doug
AU - Braga, Jose
AU - Bright, Jen
AU - Claessons, Leon
AU - Cox, Phil
AU - Dong, Xi-Ping
AU - Evans, Alistair
AU - Falkingham, Peter
AU - Friedman, Matt
AU - Garwood, Russell
AU - Goswami, Anjali
AU - Hutchinson, JOhn
AU - Jeffrey, Nathan
AU - Johanson, Zerina
AU - Lebrun, Renaud
AU - Martínez-Pérez, Carlos Martínez-Pérez
AU - Marugán-Lobón, Jesús Marugán-Lobón
AU - O'Higgins, Paul
AU - Metscher, Brian
AU - Orliac, Maëva Orliac
AU - Rowe, Timothy
AU - Rücklin, Martin Rücklin
AU - Sánchez-Villagra, Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra
AU - Shubin, Neil
AU - Smith, Selena
AU - Starck, Matthias Starck
AU - Stringer, Chris
AU - Summers, Adam Summers
AU - Sutton, Mark
AU - Walsh, Stig
AU - Weisbecker, Vera Weisbecker
AU - Witmer, Lawrence
AU - Wroe, Stephen
AU - Yin, Zongjun Yin
AU - Rayfield, Emily
AU - Donoghue, Philip Donoghue
PY - 2017/4/12
Y1 - 2017/4/12
N2 - Over the past two decades, the development of methods for visualizing and analysing specimens digitally, in three and even four dimensions, has transformed the study of living and fossil organisms. However, the initial promise that the widespread application of such methods would facilitate access to the underlying digital data has not been fully achieved. The underlying datasets for many published studies are not readily or freely available, introducing a barrier to verification and reproducibility, and the reuse of data. There is no current agreement or policy on the amount and type of data that should be made available alongside studies that use, and in some cases are wholly reliant on, digital morphology. Here, we propose a set of recommendations for minimum standards and additional best practice for three-dimensional digital data publication, and review the issues around data storage, management and accessibility.
AB - Over the past two decades, the development of methods for visualizing and analysing specimens digitally, in three and even four dimensions, has transformed the study of living and fossil organisms. However, the initial promise that the widespread application of such methods would facilitate access to the underlying digital data has not been fully achieved. The underlying datasets for many published studies are not readily or freely available, introducing a barrier to verification and reproducibility, and the reuse of data. There is no current agreement or policy on the amount and type of data that should be made available alongside studies that use, and in some cases are wholly reliant on, digital morphology. Here, we propose a set of recommendations for minimum standards and additional best practice for three-dimensional digital data publication, and review the issues around data storage, management and accessibility.
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2017.0194
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2017.0194
M3 - Article
SN - 0962-8452
JO - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
JF - Royal Society of London. Proceedings B. Biological Sciences
ER -