Abstract
We show that the notion of uncontrollable marking commonly used in the literature on supervisory control theory of Petri nets is not sound, by means of a counter-example. We also show how the definition can be corrected and provide an adaptation of a decidability proof for the problem of checking controllability for specifications expressed as deterministic Petri net languages.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 6807731 |
| Pages (from-to) | 3069-3074 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control |
| Volume | 59 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Nov 2014 |
Keywords
- Controllability
- discrete event systems (DES)
- Petri nets (PNs)
- supervisory control
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Control and Systems Engineering
- Computer Science Applications
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'On the notion of uncontrollable marking in supervisory control of petri nets'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver