Projects per year
Abstract
Background: Eye movements evoked by electrical vestibular stimulation (EVS) offer potential for diagnosing vestibular dysfunction. However, ocular recording techniques are often too invasive or impractical for routine clinical use. Furthermore, the kinematic nature of the EVS signal is not fully understood in terms of movement sensations.
New Method: We apply sinusoidal EVS stimuli varying from 0.05 to 20Hz, and record the eye in darkness using an infrared camera. Eye movement was measured offline using commercially available software to track iris striations. Response gain and phase were calculated separately for eye position, velocity and acceleration across all frequencies, to determine how the brain interprets the EVS signal.
Results: Ocular torsion responses were observed at the same frequency as the stimulus, for all frequencies, while lateral/vertical responses were minimal or absent. Response gain and phase resembled previously reported responses to natural rotation, but only when analysing eye velocity, not position or acceleration.
Comparison with Existing Method(s): Our method offers a simple, affordable, reliable and non-invasive method for tracking the ocular response to EVS. It is more convenient than scleral coil recordings, or marking the sclera to aid video tracking. It also allows us to assess the torsional VOR at frequencies not possible with natural stimuli.
Conclusions: Ocular torsion responses to EVS can be readily assessed using sinusoidal stimuli combined with an infrared camera. Gain and phase analysis suggests that the central nervous system interprets the stimulus as head roll velocity. Future work will assess the diagnostic potential for patients with vestibular disorders.
New Method: We apply sinusoidal EVS stimuli varying from 0.05 to 20Hz, and record the eye in darkness using an infrared camera. Eye movement was measured offline using commercially available software to track iris striations. Response gain and phase were calculated separately for eye position, velocity and acceleration across all frequencies, to determine how the brain interprets the EVS signal.
Results: Ocular torsion responses were observed at the same frequency as the stimulus, for all frequencies, while lateral/vertical responses were minimal or absent. Response gain and phase resembled previously reported responses to natural rotation, but only when analysing eye velocity, not position or acceleration.
Comparison with Existing Method(s): Our method offers a simple, affordable, reliable and non-invasive method for tracking the ocular response to EVS. It is more convenient than scleral coil recordings, or marking the sclera to aid video tracking. It also allows us to assess the torsional VOR at frequencies not possible with natural stimuli.
Conclusions: Ocular torsion responses to EVS can be readily assessed using sinusoidal stimuli combined with an infrared camera. Gain and phase analysis suggests that the central nervous system interprets the stimulus as head roll velocity. Future work will assess the diagnostic potential for patients with vestibular disorders.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 116-121 |
Journal | Journal of Neuroscience Methods |
Volume | 294 |
Early online date | 21 Nov 2017 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 15 Jan 2018 |
Keywords
- Vestibulo-ocular reflex
- Electrical vestibular stimulation
- Ocular torsion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Ocular torsion responses to sinusoidal electrical vestibular stimulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Projects
- 2 Finished
-
Effect of prolonged inactivity on vestibular control of balance
Reynolds, R. (Principal Investigator)
Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council
24/10/16 → 23/12/17
Project: Research Councils
-
The effect of ageing on vestibular control of balance
Reynolds, R. (Principal Investigator)
Biotechnology & Biological Sciences Research Council
3/10/11 → 2/10/13
Project: Research Councils