Abstract
There is currently an international drive to build new nuclear power plants, bringing about what is being termed a "nuclear renaissance". However, the public perception of nuclear energy has historically been, and continues to be, a key issue, particularly in light of the Fukushima nuclear incident. This paper discusses the disparity between perceived and calculated risks based on the last four decades of research into risk perception. The leading psychological and sociological theories, Psychometric Paradigm and Cultural Theory, respectively, are critically reviewed. The authors then argue that a new nuclear-build policy that promotes a broader approach to design incorporating a wider range of stakeholder inputs, including that of the lay public, may provide a means for reducing the perceived risk of a nuclear plant. Further research towards such a new approach to design is proposed, based on integrating expert and lay stakeholder inputs and taking into account broader socio-cultural factors whilst maintaining the necessary emphasis on safety, technological development, economics and environmental sustainability.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6199-6210 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Energy Policy |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Oct 2011 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The authors acknowledge gratefully funding by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) and Rolls-Royce . The views expressed in this paper are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the funding bodies.
Keywords
- Nuclear power
- Risk perception
- Stakeholder participation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- General Energy
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law