Northern Ireland and the Independent Parades Commission: Delegation and Legitimacy

Dawn Walsh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)
91 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The issue of parades remains contentious and retains the potential to lead to violence on the streets of Northern Ireland. This article uses delegation theory to examine the accusations of illegitimacy which have been made against the Independent Parades Commission (IPC). It finds that only a small number of these accusations stem from the traditional concerns that delegated bodies are unelected and unaccountable. The claim that delegated bodies lead to superior outcomes (output legitimacy) is made by some actors but contested by the Loyal Orders and unionist politicians. The argument that delegated bodies enjoy legitimacy as a result of their superior process (procedural legitimacy) is made frequently. However, the IPC processes are also a source of accusations of illegitimacy. Finally, the ethnonational conflict context raises particular issues with the legitimacy of the delegated body.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)20-40
Number of pages21
JournalIrish Political Studies
Volume30
Issue number1
Early online date30 Jul 2014
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Keywords

  • conflict resolution
  • Northern Ireland
  • delegation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Northern Ireland and the Independent Parades Commission: Delegation and Legitimacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this