Abstract
Following the publication of the Weatherall report on the use of non-human primates in research, this paper reflects on how to provide appropriate and ethical models for research beneficial to humankind. Two of the main justifications for the use of non-human primates in biomedical research are analysed. These are the "least-harm/greatest-good" argument and the "capacity" argument. This paper argues that these are equally applicable when considering whether humans are appropriate subjects of biomedical research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 655-8 |
| Number of pages | 4 |
| Journal | Journal of Medical Ethics |
| Volume | 33 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Nov 2007 |
Keywords
- Animal Experimentation
- Animals
- Biomedical Research
- Guidelines as Topic
- Humans
- Models, Animal
- Primates
- Journal Article
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Non-human Primates: The Appropriate Subjects of Biomedical Research?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver