New labour and work-time regulation: A Marxian analysis of the UK economy

Bruce Philp, Gary Slater, Daniel Wheatley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)
    100 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    This article examines the impact of work-time regulation, introduced by the UK's New Labour governments (1997-2010). In doing so, we return to Marx's hypotheses regarding the length of the working day. These include the arguments that class conflict over the length of the working day is inherently distributional in a surplus-value sense and that workers often display a preference for reduced hours even with a proportionate reduction in pay. Our quantitative Marxist methodology provides a way of assessing the pattern of surplus value before and during the period of office of the New Labour governments and the distributional effects of regulation. The impact of such regulations on workers' preferences are examined through an investigation of British Household Panel Survey data. Although many have been sceptical concerning the record of the last Labour governments, policies such as the Working Time Regulations (1998) and the Work-Life Balance Campaign (2000) are found to have been noteworthy innovations in the labour market. This is all the more important given recent moves by the successor government to weaken work-time regulation. Our results suggest the impact of these policy initiatives was broadly favourable, though the effect on men and women was different.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)711-732
    Number of pages22
    JournalCambridge Journal of Economics
    Volume39
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 16 Nov 2014

    Keywords

    • Marxian analysis
    • New labour
    • Regulation
    • Working time

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Economics and Econometrics

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'New labour and work-time regulation: A Marxian analysis of the UK economy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this