Network change point localisation under local differential privacy

Mengchu Li, Thomas Berrett, Yi Yu

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contribution

Abstract

Network data are ubiquitous in our daily life, containing rich but often sensitive information. In this paper, we expand the current static analysis of privatised networks to a dynamic framework by considering a sequence of networks with potential change points. We investigate the fundamental limits in consistently localising change points under both node and edge privacy constraints, demonstrating interesting phase transition in terms of the signal-to-noise ratio condition, accompanied by polynomial-time algorithms. The private signal-to-noise ratio conditions quantify the costs of the privacy for change point localisation problems and exhibit a different scaling in the sparsity parameter compared to the non-private counterparts. Our algorithms are shown to be optimal under the edge LDP constraint up to log factors. Under node LDP constraint, a gap exists between our upper bound and lower bound and we leave it as an interesting open problem, echoing the challenges in high-dimensional statistical inference under LDP constraints.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (NeurIPS 2022)
EditorsS. Koyejo, S. Mohamed, A. Agarwal, D. Belgrave, K. Cho, A. Oh
PublisherNeurIPS
Pages15013-15026
Number of pages14
ISBN (Print)9781713871088
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2022
Event36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022) - New Orleans, United States
Duration: 28 Nov 20229 Dec 2022

Publication series

NameAdvances in neural information processing systems
Volume35
ISSN (Print)1049-5258

Conference

Conference36th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS 2022)
Abbreviated titleNeurIPS 2022
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityNew Orleans
Period28/11/229/12/22

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Network change point localisation under local differential privacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this