Neighbourhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting - a study of Manchester

C. Durose, V. Lowndes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Citations (Scopus)
108 Downloads (Pure)


'Neighbourhood' is a long standing concept in local governance which was re-energised as part of the post-1997 New Labour policy paradigm. This paper builds on the work of Lowndes and Sullivan which identified four distinct rationales for neighbourhood working - civic, social, political and economic. The utility of the framework is explored through primary research in Manchester, UK. The research shows that different rationales are held by actors at different locations within the complex system of multi-level governance within which neighbourhood policy is made and implemented. Neighbourhood approaches to urban regeneration exist within a congested governance environment. In Manchester, regeneration has been strongly driven by the self-styled 'Team Manchester' who have provided an urban entrepreneurial vision for change in the city. Significantly, however, interventions at the neighbourhood level have shown potential for creating opportunities for citizen and community dissent and empowerment not subsumed with the narrative of the entrepreneurial city. Lowndes and Sullivan's framework provides important analytical building blocks and illuminating tools for understanding neighbourhood approaches. This research points to the merit of a dynamic approach recognising competing perspectives and contested agendas.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)341-359
Number of pages19
JournalLocal Government Studies
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2010


Dive into the research topics of 'Neighbourhood governance: Contested rationales within a multi-level setting - a study of Manchester'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this