Necrotizing black tattoo reaction: what's in a name?

Ricky Bhogal, SS Thomas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We report the rare case of an 18-year-old man who developed a necrotizing cutaneous reaction 5 days after having a permanent black tattoo on his left forearm spelling his name. Three cases of reactions to permanent black tattoos have been reported within the literature. These cases described the development of cellulitis of the skin adjacent to the tattoo but none reported florid necrotizing cutaneous reactions. The initial management with oral antibacterials failed to resolve the symptoms and use of intravenous antibacterials and topical corticosteroids was needed. Six weeks after presentation the tattoo lettering showed the presence of hyperpigmented skin. Subsequent patch testing confirmed that the patient had no allergy to black tattoo pigments suggesting that the necrotizing cutaneous reaction was secondary to infection. We show that successful treatment of this rare infective complication of permanent black tattoos involves the early institution of intravenous antibacterial agents and topical corticosteroids.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)131-3
Number of pages3
JournalAmerican journal of clinical dermatology
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2009

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Necrotizing black tattoo reaction: what's in a name?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this