Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
University of Birmingham Home
Help & FAQ
Home
Research output
Profiles
Research units
Projects
Activities
Datasets
Equipment
Prizes
Press/Media
Search by expertise, name or affiliation
Near-patient tests in primary care: setting the standards for evaluation
Brendan Delaney
, Sue Wilson
, David Fitzmaurice
, Christopher Hyde
, R Hobbs
Research output
:
Contribution to journal
›
Article
11
Citations (Scopus)
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Near-patient tests in primary care: setting the standards for evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Near-patient Testing
100%
Primary Care Setting
100%
Cost-effectiveness
50%
Primary Care
25%
Diagnostic Technology
25%
Likelihood Ratio
25%
Primary Care Physicians
25%
Treatment Monitoring
25%
Acceptable Limits
25%
Size Dependence
25%
Methodological Issues
25%
Accurate Diagnosis
25%
Technological Progress
25%
Selection Bias
25%
Quality of Care
25%
Knowledge Base
25%
Decision Problems
25%
Bias Selection
25%
New Diagnostics
25%
Verification Bias
25%
Spectral Bias
25%
Jünger
25%
Performance Reliability
25%
Reliable Monitoring
25%
Practice Costs
25%
Practitioner Knowledge
25%
Nursing and Health Professions
Primary Medical Care
100%
Cost Effectiveness Analysis
100%
Systematic Review
50%
General Practitioner
50%
Prevalence
50%
Sample Size
50%
Weakness
50%
Knowledge Base
50%
Diseases
50%
Medicine and Dentistry
Primary Health Care
100%
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
66%
Decision Making
33%
Base
33%
Systematic Review
33%
Prevalence
33%
Weakness
33%
Selection Bias
33%
Verification Bias
33%
Diseases
33%
Psychology
Decision Making
100%
Systematic Review
100%
Quality of Care
100%