Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making

Hilary Godwin, Catherine Nameth, David Avery, Lynn L Bergeson, Daniel Bernard, Elizabeth Beryt, William Boyes, Scott Brown, Amy J Clippinger, Yoram Cohen, Maria Doa, Christine Ogilvie Hendren, Patricia Holden, Keith Houck, Agnes B Kane, Frederick Klaessig, Toivo Kodas, Robert Landsiedel, Iseult Lynch, Timothy MalloyMary Beth Miller, Julie Muller, Gunter Oberdorster, Elijah J Petersen, Richard C Pleus, Philip Sayre, Vicki Stone, Kristie M Sullivan, Jutta Tentschert, Philip Wallis, Andre E Nel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

110 Citations (Scopus)


For nanotechnology to meet its potential as a game-changing and sustainable technology, it is important to ensure that the engineered nanomaterials and nanoenabled products that gain entry to the marketplace are safe and effective. Tools and methods are needed for regulatory purposes to allow rapid material categorization according to human health and environmental risk potential, so that materials of high concern can be targeted for additional scrutiny, while material categories that pose the least risk can receive expedited review. Using carbon nanotubes as an example, we discuss how data from alternative testing strategies can be used to facilitate engineered nanomaterial categorization according to risk potential and how such an approach could facilitate regulatory decision-making in the future.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3409-17
Number of pages9
JournalACS Nano
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 28 Apr 2015


Dive into the research topics of 'Nanomaterial categorization for assessing risk potential to facilitate regulatory decision-making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this