Mumps and the media: changes in the reporting of mumps in response to newspaper coverage

Babatunde Olowokure, L Clark, AJ Elliot, D Harding, A Fleming

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    16 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    OBJECTIVE: To determine the links between national newspaper coverage of mumps after a press release and increased reports of clinical mumps cases. DESIGN AND SETTING: A cross sectional study involving people aged 15-24 years in the West Midlands, and England and Wales. Reported mumps cases were obtained from statutory notifications of infectious diseases to the Health Protection Agency and reports to the Royal College of General Practitioners Weekly Returns Service. Data on newspaper coverage was obtained by retrospectively reviewing the Health Protection Agency press archives. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The effect of newspaper coverage was assessed by examining the 4 weeks before the press release (weeks 15-18 of the year), a 2-week period that included the week of the press release (weeks 19-20) and 4 weeks after the press release (weeks 21-24). MAIN RESULTS: Mumps notification rates were declining before increased newspaper coverage. Significant increases in national (from 28.3/100 000 population (95% CI 26.5 to 30.1) in weeks 18 to 42.8 (95% CI 40.6 to 45) in week 20) and local (from 9.8 (95% CI 7.4 to 12.1) to 21.2 (95% CI 17.7 to 24.6)) notification rates were seen after increased newspaper coverage. Reports rapidly declined after decreased media interest. CONCLUSIONS: The reported incidence rate of mumps seems to be markedly influenced by the level of newspaper coverage. This has implications for surveillance activities.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)385-8
    Number of pages4
    JournalJournal of Epidemiology and Community Health
    Volume61
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 May 2007

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Mumps and the media: changes in the reporting of mumps in response to newspaper coverage'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this