Multi-Phase Sputtered TiO2-Induced Current–Voltage Distortion in Sb2Se3 Solar Cells

Christopher H. Don*, Thomas P. Shalvey, Matthew J. Smiles, Laurie J. Phillips, Theodore D.C. Hobson, Harry Finch, Leanne A.H. Jones, Jack E.N. Swallow, Nicole Fleck, Christopher Markwell, Pardeep K. Thakur, Tien Lin Lee, Deepnarayan Biswas, Leon Bowen, Benjamin A.D. Williamson, David O. Scanlon, Vinod R. Dhanak, Ken Durose, Tim D. Veal, Jonathan D. MajorLuke Thomas

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Despite the recent success of CdS/Sb2Se3 heterojunction devices, cadmium toxicity, parasitic absorption from the relatively narrow CdS band gap (2.4 eV) and multiple reports of inter-diffusion at the interface forming Cd(S,Se) and Sb2(S,Se)3 phases, present significant limitations to this device architecture. Among the options for alternative partner layers in antimony chalcogenide solar cells, the wide band gap, non-toxic titanium dioxide (TiO2) has demonstrated the most promise. It is generally accepted that the anatase phase of the polymorphic TiO2 is preferred, although there is currently an absence of analysis with regard to phase influence on device performance. This work reports approaches to distinguish between TiO2 phases using both surface and bulk characterization methods. A device fabricated with a radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtered rutile-TiO2 window layer (FTO/TiO2/Sb2Se3/P3HT/Au) achieved an efficiency of 6.88% and near-record short–circuit current density (Jsc) of 32.44 mA cm−2, which is comparable to established solution based TiO2 fabrication methods that produced a highly anatase-TiO2 partner layer and a 6.91% efficiency device. The sputtered method introduces reproducibility challenges via the enhancement of interfacial charge barriers in multi-phase TiO2 films with a rutile surface and anatase bulk. This is shown to introduce severe S-shaped current–voltage (J–V) distortion and a drastic fill–factor (FF reduction in these devices.

Original languageEnglish
Article number2300238
Number of pages15
JournalAdvanced Materials Interfaces
Volume10
Issue number20
Early online date16 Jun 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Jul 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Funding for the work was provided by; EPSRC via EP/N014057/1, EP/T006188/1, EP/W03445X/1, EP/R513271/1, EP/N509693/1, EP/L01551X/1, Northern Accelerator Grant NACCF230 and SolPV Grant EP/V008692/1. We acknowledge Diamond Light Source for time on Beamline I09 under Proposal No. SI32696−1 and SI31170. The authors also acknowledge the use of the UCL Kathleen and Thomas High Performance Computing Facility. Via membership of the UK's HEC Materials Chemistry Consortium, which is funded by the EPSRC (EP/R029431, EP/T022213), this work used the ARCHER2 UK National Supercomputing Service (www.archer2.ac.uk) and the UK Materials and Molecular Modelling (MMM) Hub (Thomas – EP/P020194 & Young – EP/T022213. Data files related to the project are available from DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.7752539 or from the corresponding author.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors. Advanced Materials Interfaces published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Keywords

  • anatase
  • barrier
  • photovoltaics
  • rutile
  • S-shape
  • SbSe
  • TiO

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Mechanical Engineering

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multi-Phase Sputtered TiO2-Induced Current–Voltage Distortion in Sb2Se3 Solar Cells'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this