Mortality in patients with Cushing's disease more than 10 years after remission: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective cohort study

Richard Clayton, Peter Jones, Raoul Reulen, Paul Stewart, Zaki Hassan-Smith, Georgia Ntali, Niki Karavitaki, Olaf Dekkers, Alberto Pereira, Mark Bolland, Ian Holdaway, Jorgen Lindholm

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

90 Citations (Scopus)
559 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

BackgroundNo agreement has been reached on the long-term survival prospects for patients with Cushing's disease. We studied life expectancy in patients who had received curative treatment and whose hypercortisolism remained in remission for more than 10 years, and identified factors determining their survival.
MethodsWe did a multicentre, multinational, retrospective cohort study using individual case records from specialist referral centres in the UK, Denmark, the Netherlands, and New Zealand. Inclusion criteria for participants, who had all been in studies reported previously in peer-reviewed publications, were diagnosis and treatment of Cushing's disease, being cured of hypercortisolism for a minimum of 10 years at study entry, and continuing to be cured with no relapses until the database was frozen or death. We identified the number and type of treatments used to achieve cure, and used mortality as our primary endpoint. We compared mortality rates between patients with Cushing's disease and the general population, and expressed them as standardised mortality ratios (SMRs). We analysed survival data with multivariate analysis (Cox regression) with no corrections for multiple testing.
FindingsThe census dates on which the data were frozen ranged from Dec 31, 2009, to Dec 1, 2014. We obtained data for 320 patients with 3790 person-years of follow-up from 10 years after cure (female:male ratio of 3:1). The median patient follow-up was 11·8 years (IQR 17–26) from study entry and did not differ between countries. There were no significant differences in demographic characteristics, duration of follow-up, comorbidities, treatment number, or type of treatment between women and men, so we pooled data from both sexes for survival analysis. 51 (16%) of the cohort died during follow-up from study entry (10 years after cure). Median survival from study entry was similar for women (31 years; IQR 19–38) and men (28 years; 24–42), and about 40 years (IQR 30–48) from remission. The overall SMR for all-cause mortality was 1·61 (95% CI 1·23–2·12; p=0·0001). The SMR for circulatory disease was increased at 2·72 (1·88–3·95; p<0·0001), but deaths from cancer were not higher than expected (0·79, 0·41–1·51). Presence of diabetes, but not hypertension, was an independent risk factor for mortality (hazard ratio 2·82, 95% CI 1·29–6·17; p=0·0095). We noted a step-wise reduction in survival with increasing number of treatments. Patients cured by pituitary surgery alone had long-term survival similar to that of the general population (SMR 0·95, 95% CI 0·58–1·55) compared with those who were not (2·53, 1·82–3·53; p<0·0001).
InterpretationPatients with Cushing's disease who have been in remission for more than 10 years are at increased risk of overall mortality compared with the general population, particularly from circulatory disease. However, median survival from cure is excellent at about 40 years of remission. Treatment complexity and an increased number of treatments, reflecting disease that is more difficult to control, appears to negatively affect survival. Pituitary surgery alone is the preferred treatment to secure an optimum outcome, and should be done in a centre of surgical excellence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)569-576
Number of pages8
JournalThe Lancet Diabetes and Endocrinology
Volume4
Issue number7
Early online date2 Jun 2016
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2016

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mortality in patients with Cushing's disease more than 10 years after remission: a multicentre, multinational, retrospective cohort study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this