Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study

D J W McMinn; Kym Iris Erika Snell; J Daniel; R B C Treacy; P B Pynsent; R D Riley

doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319

Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study

D J W McMinn, Kym Iris Erika Snell, J Daniel, R B C Treacy, P B Pynsent, R D Riley

Applied Health Research

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

101 Citations (Scopus)

244 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	e3319
Journal	British Medical Journal
Volume	344
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.e3319
Publication status	Published - 14 Jun 2012

Bibliographical note

This article has corrections. Please see:
Errata - June 27, 2012
In the online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) some late changes to the figures were not reflected in the legends. In figures 1 and 2 the confidence intervals are not all shown as dashed lines, as stated in the legend, but as thinner versions of the lines showing the survival curves.
Errata - September 18, 2012
The online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) suggested that the National Joint Registry provided raw patient level data to the authors. In fact, the dataset was requested from the NJR via an employee of Smith and Nephew at the request of the first author, and passed on to the authors for analysis. The paper also stated that the dataset included linkage to hospital episode statistics (PEDW in Wales). This dataset in fact was provided solely by the NJR and contained precise information on time to implant revision and time to death.

Keywords

Young Adult
Prosthesis Failure
Humans
Reoperation
Aged
Osteoarthritis, Hip
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
Cementation
Multivariate Analysis
Registries
Aged, 80 and over
Adult
Cohort Studies
Middle Aged
Adolescent
Female
Male
Survival Analysis

Access to Document

10.1136/bmj.e3319

Snell_Mortality_and_implant_revision_BMJ_2012
Eligibility for repository: Checked on 22/10/2015
Final published version, 739 KBLicence: Creative Commons: Attribution (CC BY)

Cite this

@article{f3db103539f64bd295a5634ed7ad11e4,

title = "Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study",

abstract = "To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing.",

keywords = "Young Adult, Prosthesis Failure, Humans, Reoperation, Aged, Osteoarthritis, Hip, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip, Cementation, Multivariate Analysis, Registries, Aged, 80 and over, Adult, Cohort Studies, Middle Aged, Adolescent, Female, Male, Survival Analysis",

author = "McMinn, {D J W} and Snell, {Kym Iris Erika} and J Daniel and Treacy, {R B C} and Pynsent, {P B} and Riley, {R D}",

note = "This article has corrections. Please see: Errata - June 27, 2012 In the online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) some late changes to the figures were not reflected in the legends. In figures 1 and 2 the confidence intervals are not all shown as dashed lines, as stated in the legend, but as thinner versions of the lines showing the survival curves. Errata - September 18, 2012 The online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) suggested that the National Joint Registry provided raw patient level data to the authors. In fact, the dataset was requested from the NJR via an employee of Smith and Nephew at the request of the first author, and passed on to the authors for analysis. The paper also stated that the dataset included linkage to hospital episode statistics (PEDW in Wales). This dataset in fact was provided solely by the NJR and contained precise information on time to implant revision and time to death. ",

year = "2012",

month = jun,

day = "14",

doi = "10.1136/bmj.e3319",

language = "English",

volume = "344",

pages = "e3319",

journal = "British Medical Journal",

issn = "1756-1833",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis

T2 - registry based cohort study

AU - McMinn, D J W

AU - Snell, Kym Iris Erika

AU - Daniel, J

AU - Treacy, R B C

AU - Pynsent, P B

AU - Riley, R D

N1 - This article has corrections. Please see: Errata - June 27, 2012 In the online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) some late changes to the figures were not reflected in the legends. In figures 1 and 2 the confidence intervals are not all shown as dashed lines, as stated in the legend, but as thinner versions of the lines showing the survival curves. Errata - September 18, 2012 The online version of this Research paper by D J W McMinn and colleagues (BMJ 2012;344:e3319, doi:10.1136/bmj.e3319) suggested that the National Joint Registry provided raw patient level data to the authors. In fact, the dataset was requested from the NJR via an employee of Smith and Nephew at the request of the first author, and passed on to the authors for analysis. The paper also stated that the dataset included linkage to hospital episode statistics (PEDW in Wales). This dataset in fact was provided solely by the NJR and contained precise information on time to implant revision and time to death.

PY - 2012/6/14

Y1 - 2012/6/14

N2 - To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing.

AB - To examine mortality and revision rates among patients with osteoarthritis undergoing hip arthroplasty and to compare these rates between patients undergoing cemented or uncemented procedures and to compare outcomes between men undergoing stemmed total hip replacements and Birmingham hip resurfacing.

KW - Young Adult

KW - Prosthesis Failure

KW - Humans

KW - Reoperation

KW - Aged

KW - Osteoarthritis, Hip

KW - Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip

KW - Cementation

KW - Multivariate Analysis

KW - Registries

KW - Aged, 80 and over

KW - Adult

KW - Cohort Studies

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Adolescent

KW - Female

KW - Male

KW - Survival Analysis

U2 - 10.1136/bmj.e3319

DO - 10.1136/bmj.e3319

M3 - Article

C2 - 22700782

SN - 1756-1833

SN - 1468-5833

VL - 344

SP - e3319

JO - British Medical Journal

JF - British Medical Journal

ER -

Mortality and implant revision rates of hip arthroplasty in patients with osteoarthritis: registry based cohort study

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this