Molecular fingerprints of conazoles via functional genomic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Miao Guan*, Pu Xia, Mingming Tian, Dong Chen, Xiaowei Zhang

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Conazoles were designed to inhibit ergosterol biosynthesis. Conazoles have been widely used as agricultural fungicides and are frequently detected in the environment. Although conazoles have been reported to have adverse effects, such as potential carcinogenic effects, the underlying molecular mechanisms of toxicity remain unclear. Here, the molecular fingerprints of five conazoles (propiconazole (Pro), penconazole (Pen), tebuconazole (Teb), flusilazole (Flu) and epoxiconazole (Epo)) were assessed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (yeast) via functional genome-wide knockout mutant profiling. A total of 169 (4.49%), 176 (4.67%), 198 (5.26%), 218 (5.79%) and 173 (4.59%) responsive genes were identified at three concentrations (IC50, IC20 and IC10) of Pro, Pen, Teb, Flu and Epo, respectively. The five conazoles tended to have similar gene mutant fingerprints and toxicity mechanisms. “Ribosome” (sce03010) and “cytoplasmic translation” (GO: 0002181) were the common KEGG pathway and GO biological process term by gene set enrichment analysis of the responsive genes, which suggested that conazoles influenced protein synthesis. Conazoles also affected fatty acids synthesis because “biosynthesis of unsaturated fatty acids” pathway was among the top-ranked KEGG pathways. Moreover, two genes, YGR037C (acyl-CoA-binding protein) and YCR034W (fatty acid elongase), were key fingerprints of conazoles because they played vital roles in conazole-induced toxicity. Overall, the fingerprints derived from the yeast functional genomic screening provide an alternative approach to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of environmental pollutant conazoles.

Original languageEnglish
Article number104998
JournalToxicology in Vitro
Volume69
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
For support, we thank the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (grant no. 19KJB180003 ), the Natural Science Foundation from Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20171035 and BK20160043 ) and Program B for Outstanding Ph.D. Candidates of Nanjing University (grant no. 201702B058 ,grant no. 201702B056 and no. 201701B018 ). X.Z. was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities .

Funding Information:
For support, we thank the Natural Science Foundation of the Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (grant no. 19KJB180003), the Natural Science Foundation from Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20171035 and BK20160043) and Program B for Outstanding Ph.D. Candidates of Nanjing University (grant no. 201702B058?grant no. 201702B056 and no. 201701B018). X.Z. was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd

Keywords

  • DNA damage
  • Fatty acid synthesis
  • Fingerprints
  • Mutant screening
  • Protein synthesis
  • Responsive genes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Toxicology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Molecular fingerprints of conazoles via functional genomic profiling of Saccharomyces cerevisiae'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this